Author |
Page 1 |
Lord GreyWolf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 09/05/12 Last Visit 11/08/13 92 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 07:25:14 GMT Well my H&R order arrived in quick time about a week from the U.K to lil ole NZ. Not to bad. I ordered: 9x Panthers [good minis no major issue with turrets and barrels] 6x Wespe [happy with these no issues] 3x Hummel [happy with these no issues] 3x 88mm AA/AT [happy with these no issues] 4x ISU152 [some of them had bent barrels] 4x ISU122 [some of them had bent barrels] 3x 76.2 mm (MODEL 1943) INFANTRY GUN + CREW and some command sprues, flamers, arty crew, motor bikes, stuff to add to command bases. Will post pics on my blog tomorrow night. Over all I am happy with my order this being my 1st time ordering from them as I mainly have CnC 6mm range. the only issues I have is the Infantry are TINY I know that 6mm is small but compared to my Adler range they just come to the Adler shoulders. So my engineer flamers may not be used in the end due to the size be so different [and yes I knew that H&R are 1/300 and Adler are more 1/285] but its so like AAARRGGHHH!!!! not sure how the motorcycles and side cars are going to stack up next to my CnC stuff. Will try and sort out the stands tonight and see what they look like. Cheers LGW |
SteveJ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 26/03/08 Last Visit 20/02/25 761 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 07:45:17 GMT I know the H&R are pretty true to scale and therefore look tiny. GHQ figures in comparison are massive and way out of scale IMHO, although they are quite detailed. |
ianrs54
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bd08/5bd08e95fbcfd0064fbae38514694d37fa38f844" alt="England England" Joined 08/11/08 Last Visit 19/01/23 1348 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 08:07:38 GMT Adler are way over scale. IanS |
Lord GreyWolf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 09/05/12 Last Visit 15/08/13 92 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 08:34:36 GMT not saying the detail isn't there.... they have amazing detail on the infantry. The tanks and SPG I got are pretty close to the CnC that they don't look small. just right as Far as I am concerned. over all dam happy with the order and will be ordering more stuff off them in the future. Want to make a New Zealand Rifle battalion from the North Africa [Mid war list]. My popa served there got his service medals from that theatre so want to play that part of the war. Cheers LGW |
Lord GreyWolf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 09/05/12 Last Visit 15/08/13 92 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 09:54:20 GMT I just worked out a quick army list for Late war Eastern front Germans and It came to 10,000pts OMFG how did I get to that so dam quickly haven't worked out the Russians yet and I still didn't even add in planes DANG!!!! Will be fun to play thought. Cheers LGW |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 10:52:37 GMT Sounds about right data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98a78/98a78719d2310f5f77ca8dcf4aebac4eb2b33948" alt="Gimme Gimme" |
Lord GreyWolf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 09/05/12 Last Visit 15/08/13 92 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 11:21:36 GMT lol Pete and my Soviets are well over 10k... I bought 4 ISU 122 and 4 ISU 152 thinking I could field both but the battlegroup said I had to many same thing with my German armoured arty I couldn't take 3 wespes and 3 hummels. :( LGW |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 11:26:06 GMT They can add variety, you'll only get bored using the same kit in each battle data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45320/453201d314a0079453bbb75c75dedeeeabdd1811" alt="Smile Smile" |
ianrs54
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bd08/5bd08e95fbcfd0064fbae38514694d37fa38f844" alt="England England" Joined 08/11/08 Last Visit 19/01/23 1348 Posts
|
Posted on 29 May 2012 at 12:59:19 GMT The Soviet ISU's and heavy tanks are one of the places where you need to think sideways a bit - the roam around in 5 vehicle companies, so use 1 base as a "company" Nother one is the British Carrier platoon - no set of rules covers it well, I use 1 base per section of 3, so 4 for a rifke btn, and 3 per Motor Inf Coy. Lots I know, but negets the right effect. IanS |
Lord GreyWolf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 09/05/12 Last Visit 15/08/13 92 Posts
|
Posted on 30 May 2012 at 09:29:43 GMT So what is the main difference between having Artillery Support unit and Artillery unit? LGW |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 30 May 2012 at 10:28:08 GMT One's on-table, the other is off. |
Lord GreyWolf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 09/05/12 Last Visit 15/08/13 92 Posts
|
Posted on 30 May 2012 at 11:05:31 GMT well i prefer mine on the table especially the Wespe and/or Hummels. Cheers LGW wish I could have more on table arty though.... btw how many battlegroups could I make? is it possible to have 3 battlegroups at 1,000pts each? and field them as one group choosing one of the Co's as overall commander? |
Page 1 |