Author |
Page 1 |
Leader
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 07/07/04 Last Visit 03/05/21 255 Posts
|
Posted on 26 December 2013 at 16:30:33 GMT 1. When a unit is forced to move such as being made to fall back, the rules say the movement has to be directly away from the nearest enemy that fired. There have been many occasions where the unit being forced to fall back would 'clip' either a friendly unit or impassable terrain. We have tended to ignore such small clips and in fact allow the unit to fall back providing there is a gap wide enough for the unit to pass through and that the unit needn't deviate more than 45 degrees from the direct direction. Are we being too generous? If a unit falls back into a friendly command unit, is the command unit suppressed or does the unit just pass through? |
StormforceX
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 31/03/06 Last Visit 14/03/15 182 Posts
|
Posted on 26 December 2013 at 17:12:09 GMT As a solo player this is never a problem. I just move the unit by the route I think they are most likely to run. |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 26 December 2013 at 20:11:20 GMT Do you never get into arguments with yourself? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca82f/ca82f8bb9d3bc9c39490a00be17d9c92c441fed3" alt="Huh? Huh?" I'd go the sensible way with this rule and allow the unit to move as far as it needs to so as to avoid bumping into other units. |
Leader
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 07/07/04 Last Visit 03/05/21 255 Posts
|
Posted on 26 December 2013 at 21:53:24 GMT My different opponents like to play these situations differently to each other so I go with whichever way my opponent wants to play it. One insists direct means direct, and aims to make units fall back into others. I see this as a bit harsh but it is what the rules say. The other two look to make the unit move it's full distance but within the 45 degrees of 'directly away' and then only bumps non-command units if it still cannot make it's full move. I prefer this data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45320/453201d314a0079453bbb75c75dedeeeabdd1811" alt="Smile Smile" but it is not as per the rules data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1fd/7a1fd9c819db72f0667767049cbee5c6e14bd600" alt="Wink Wink" so I thought I would ask what others do. |
Gun-Pit Paul
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bd08/5bd08e95fbcfd0064fbae38514694d37fa38f844" alt="England England" Joined 10/02/08 Last Visit 29/01/19 170 Posts
|
Posted on 27 December 2013 at 11:05:03 GMT Paul Ref. the one that goes strictly by the rules... Pointy stick. Isn't this supposed to be a GAME! Do you force him to do the same? If you do, does he moan? As an aside, ask him to run through a wood in a straight line, no swerving to avoid trees, etc Paul Happy New Year to all. |
Prophaniti
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 13/02/07 Last Visit 13/08/19 42 Posts
|
Posted on 27 December 2013 at 11:09:48 GMT I would tend to play the rules as written, but a little flexibility is fine if it is what both players are expecting. I would think the falling back into others causing suppression is to represent panic and confusion caused by seeing your comrades legging it! Deliberately moving to cause this is perhaps a little unsporting, but it's a flaw I'd accept in this great rules set. |
gwydion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 15/02/08 Last Visit 21/06/22 305 Posts
|
Posted on 27 December 2013 at 11:30:29 GMT I know they're Pete's rules and he's said you can avoid bumping into other units, but... The rule says troops falling back into friendly units halt, suppressing them. If you are going to allow units falling back to swan around sidestepping units behind them I can't see the point of this rule. So its straight back and tough if you contact anyone for me I'm afraid. I can't see this is pointy stick territory either - it's there in the rules, its there for a reason and the reason makes sense - to reflect the morale effect of units running back through you. If anything it seems like pointy stick time for those who want to ignore it and pretend these scared, panicking troops have enough cohesion to say to themselves - "oops!. Better not run into 2nd troop, they'll get scared, we'll just run an extra few hundred metres up the hill and go around their position without bothering them.' (All in favour of pointy stick treatment for trying to make the letter of the rules fly in the face of reality- but the boot seems to be on the other foot here-maybe Yep its a game data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d24/e4d24ea1452f70bf76620ba09a1840c590e3b2e1" alt="Grin Grin" but its a game trying to at least pay a bit of lip service to reality, otherwise it would be chess (and that doesn't let pieces suddenly change the moves they can make either data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7e23/c7e23757abbf0e06d560f81c98af4e7382f15e54" alt="Cool Cool" ) |
toxicpixie
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 09/03/11 Last Visit 17/07/21 2177 Posts
|
Posted on 27 December 2013 at 11:39:37 GMT Afraid I agree with Gwydion. No point to the rule unless you use it! |
Gun-Pit Paul
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bd08/5bd08e95fbcfd0064fbae38514694d37fa38f844" alt="England England" Joined 10/02/08 Last Visit 29/01/19 170 Posts
|
Posted on 27 December 2013 at 13:02:48 GMT Hi Guys Didn't mean to say that we ignore Pete's rules, but Paul, in his opening statement, said "...'clip'...". I totally agree with NOT allowing a unit to swerve a large amount to miss another unit, but if it just clips that unit, I would be OK with a slight swerve. (I suppose you need to define 'clips'). Paul |
cardophillipo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91acc/91acc9dda92684df4dc22f67b7f5f2edcaca0043" alt="Sea Sea" Joined 29/01/09 Last Visit 20/01/22 997 Posts
|
Posted on 27 December 2013 at 13:27:07 GMT Need some NKVD Barrage Units that would solve the problem data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d24/e4d24ea1452f70bf76620ba09a1840c590e3b2e1" alt="Grin Grin" |
gwydion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 15/02/08 Last Visit 21/06/22 305 Posts
|
Posted on 27 December 2013 at 15:07:39 GMT Paul, yeah, totally agree - I suppose I had visions of people doing 90 degree swerves - I can live with 0.5mm deviation I guess @Cardophillipo -that's just mean! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d24/e4d24ea1452f70bf76620ba09a1840c590e3b2e1" alt="Grin Grin" |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 27 December 2013 at 16:30:55 GMT Oh does it say that in the book data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca82f/ca82f8bb9d3bc9c39490a00be17d9c92c441fed3" alt="Huh? Huh?" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d24/e4d24ea1452f70bf76620ba09a1840c590e3b2e1" alt="Grin Grin" Go with the book then! |
Leader
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 07/07/04 Last Visit 03/05/21 255 Posts
|
Posted on 29 December 2013 at 12:20:29 GMT Excellent! So 0.5mm deviation it is then, that should keep all 3 pleased! Any suggestions as to if a command unit gets suppressed if a unit falls back into it? |
Englishman
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bd08/5bd08e95fbcfd0064fbae38514694d37fa38f844" alt="England England" Joined 08/11/06 Last Visit 27/08/15 78 Posts
|
Posted on 29 December 2013 at 19:39:04 GMT I would say so. |
AJ at the bank
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 23/09/07 Last Visit 14/06/24 335 Posts
|
Posted on 29 December 2013 at 20:03:00 GMT 0.5mm or 0.5cm?? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45320/453201d314a0079453bbb75c75dedeeeabdd1811" alt="Smile Smile" |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 29 December 2013 at 20:11:46 GMT No, command units don't get suppressed. They can be moved out of the way. |
Leader
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 07/07/04 Last Visit 03/05/21 255 Posts
|
Posted on 29 December 2013 at 22:37:05 GMT Another little mystery solved, cheers! |
Page 1 |