The Commander Series Forum

Forum Home Forum Home
ImageCurrent Forum Category Blitzkrieg Commander, 1936-45
ImageImageCurrent Forum BKC-II Rule Queries
ImageImageImageCurrent Topic Save
Post Reply
Post Reply
Author Page 1 
LEONARDO
Italy
Joined 04/06/08
Last Visit 27/08/18
413 Posts
Posted on 22 February 2013 at 21:26:12 GMT
Hallo, after a lot of time I have played again BKC2
And I have a question. Why save value? when a target is
in cover (light or hard)the probably to hit it are 5-6 or 6 (the effect of cover).
In fact in BKC1 the save value was an option.
Pete says that in BKC1 was too easy to hit troops in cover but
in BKC2 is too hard.
Northern Monkey
England
Joined 13/04/12
Last Visit 18/08/19
146 Posts
Posted on 25 February 2013 at 19:53:21 GMT
Just my opinion and i never played BKC1 so dont know the differences but whilst i agree its hard to damage units in cover that have a save, i think its realistically difficult, and have found that close assault is the only sure fire way of dis-lodging enemy unis in this type of position, so maybe it was included to stop the over use of simply shelling the shit out of dug in opponentsGrin
billb
United States
Joined 20/07/05
Last Visit 03/06/19
322 Posts
Posted on 26 February 2013 at 06:23:44 GMT
The save value represents the armor of the target. Targets in cover are harder to hit due to less of the vehicle being exposed to fire, but the armor save still applies to any hits on the vehicle even if only part of it can be hit.
LEONARDO
Italy
Joined 04/06/08
Last Visit 27/08/18
413 Posts
Posted on 27 February 2013 at 18:38:22 GMT
Yes Happymc, I have considered your opinion in fact Pete says
the same thing but in BKCII it's hard suppress troops in cover terrain such built-up area so it's not possible (or possible with heavy losses) a close assault.
I have tried an house rule with auto suppression for all
HE weapons when fire on infantry and soft-skin targets.
collins355
United Kingdom
Joined 16/08/09
Last Visit 27/08/21
170 Posts
Posted on 27 February 2013 at 19:32:48 GMT
I'd suggest as we have discussed elsewhere on this forum that you consider rating your troops green-regular-veteran and playing suppression as 4+ for green, 5+ for regular and 6+ for elite in any terrain.

Makes for a far better game and stops people using urban areas to hide their infantry. You'll still have to roll a six to hit them at all of course.
SCAdian
United States
Joined 27/04/04
Last Visit 02/09/13
82 Posts
Posted on 27 February 2013 at 19:42:36 GMT
Now that idea, I like.
foxbat
France
Joined 20/08/10
Last Visit 19/04/23
137 Posts
Posted on 28 February 2013 at 08:22:59 GMT
Conversely, not rating your troops, keeping to hit numbers and save value, but needing a mere 4 to inflict suppresssion, not the same 6 you need to hit.
Suppression becomes much easier, preparing dug in tropps for a close assault. At the same time, actual hits are likely to remain few, so shelling from afar remains a waste of time. Grin
Dr Dave
Wales
Joined 08/10/07
Last Visit 04/11/19
936 Posts
Posted on 28 February 2013 at 10:44:04 GMT
"suppression as 4+ for green, 5+ for regular and 6+ for elite in any terrain"

This is an optional rule in CWC and that's how we always play it bor BKC. We think it leads to a much more relaistic game. Every one isn't the same. Rating the Australians in 1940 the same as a Lybian division isn't very realistic.
toxicpixie
United Kingdom
Joined 09/03/11
Last Visit 17/07/21
2177 Posts
Posted on 28 February 2013 at 14:24:00 GMT
That might help alleviate the excellent nature of trenches... do you increase points for vets and decrease for green troops btw?
Dr Dave
Wales
Joined 08/10/07
Last Visit 04/11/19
936 Posts
Posted on 28 February 2013 at 17:52:57 GMT
Never use points.

I think CWC optional rules say -10% for green, +10% for elite.
Dr Dave
Wales
Joined 08/10/07
Last Visit 04/11/19
936 Posts
Posted on 28 February 2013 at 22:49:18 GMT
Yes, hits and saves stay the same. Then for each unsaved hit we roll a d6. Suppressed on a 4 for poor, 5 for average and 6 for elites.
toxicpixie
United Kingdom
Joined 09/03/11
Last Visit 17/07/21
2177 Posts
Posted on 28 February 2013 at 23:28:20 GMT
Cheers Dr Dave!
LEONARDO
Italy
Joined 04/06/08
Last Visit 27/08/18
413 Posts
Posted on 01 March 2013 at 10:44:47 GMT
Excuse me DrDave where is this optional rule in CWC?
Dr Dave
Wales
Joined 08/10/07
Last Visit 04/11/19
936 Posts
Posted on 01 March 2013 at 18:28:58 GMT
p.55 with doctrine
LEONARDO
Italy
Joined 04/06/08
Last Visit 27/08/18
413 Posts
Posted on 02 March 2013 at 00:24:53 GMT
Thank DrDave, it's a usefull information!!!
Page 1