Posted on 06 May 2011 at 08:06:58 GMT The high rate of fire with the MG-34/42 is a RED HERRING. The weapons are not the best in the LMG role, nor for sustained fire. The dont have an easy change barrel, you need to use a glove, were the hell is it. It's also been established, for NWE anyway, that 1 burst hit 1 man, and 1 Full Calibre Rifle round would put a man down. Double tapping a Bren (which is dead easy), was much more economical than the multi shots form it's German equivalent. The rates being quoted are cyclic, the weapon can do that in contious fire, but they arn't used that way, you need to find the pratical rate, for a Bren about 100-120 rounds min, and an MG34-42 may be 200. Difference between WWI and WWII is one of formation, in WWI the troops operated in an extended line, and the Vickers/MG-08 were sited to enfilade these, WWII this was more dispered, so less effective MG fire. IanS |