The Commander Series Forum

Forum Home Forum Home
ImageCurrent Forum Category Blitzkrieg Commander, 1936-45
ImageImageCurrent Forum BKC-II Rule Queries
ImageImageImageCurrent Topic Off-Table Artillery Command Throw
Post Reply
Post Reply
Author Page 1 
ge2002bill
United States
Joined 11/01/10
Last Visit 16/08/21
51 Posts
Posted on 14 March 2011 at 19:13:08 GMT
Hello Pete,
Off-Table Artillery
----------
3x 100mm gun stands are off-table.
2x Forward Artillery Observers are on the table; each with a command value of 6.
---------------------------------------
One arty. observer fails his command throw for the three guns. He throws a 7 to 11.
---
Afterwards in the same turn, can the other observer:
(a) Throw for a 6?
(b) Throw for a 6-1 =5?
(c) Or?
(d) Or not at all?
-----
Respectfully,
Bill
stu_dew
United Kingdom
Joined 26/03/08
Last Visit 08/05/12
170 Posts
Posted on 14 March 2011 at 19:34:49 GMT
Option (a) as although there is a -1 modifier for each successive order to a unit or formation (command modifiers table on page five) a failed command roll "means the order was not issued" (paragraph 3, page 5) to the failed attempt from the first FAO will not adversely affect the second's.
pete
Wales
Joined 05/02/04
Last Visit 07/05/19
3793 Posts
Posted on 14 March 2011 at 19:35:22 GMT
(a) Smile
ebarrett
Ireland
Joined 20/12/07
Last Visit 31/10/12
55 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 10:25:44 GMT
Really? I though off board arty was like an on table command - once someone has tried and fluffed the roll no one else can try to command them that round.
pete
Wales
Joined 05/02/04
Last Visit 07/05/19
3793 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 11:21:24 GMT
Nope, read the section on artillery Wink
ebarrett
Ireland
Joined 20/12/07
Last Visit 31/10/12
55 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 21:01:15 GMT
Okay, well a follow up question. The American lists give the Yanks Close Artillery Support; if an American HQ units attempts to call in arty and fails the roll can that command unit then carry on attempting to command it's troops or is it done for the round?
pete
Wales
Joined 05/02/04
Last Visit 07/05/19
3793 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 21:17:29 GMT
Yes.
By-Tor
United Kingdom
Joined 16/11/10
Last Visit 11/04/21
63 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 21:23:43 GMT
On another follow up if a Russian Scout unit with the artillery call in ability at Ld.6, if they fluff that can they attempt a communication instead?
pete
Wales
Joined 05/02/04
Last Visit 07/05/19
3793 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 22:03:58 GMT
No
stu_dew
United Kingdom
Joined 26/03/08
Last Visit 08/05/12
170 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 22:25:28 GMT
Q. "...if an American HQ units attempts to call in arty and fails the roll can that command unit then carry on attempting to command it's troops or is it done for the round?"

A. "Yes."


Double-barrelled, mutually exclusive proposition in that question, Pete. I'm thinking the "Yes" was for the "is it done for the round" part and not the "can that unit then carry on attempting to command its troops" bit.

Question
stu_dew
United Kingdom
Joined 26/03/08
Last Visit 08/05/12
170 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 22:27:57 GMT
(If not I've been getting things very wrong...)
pete
Wales
Joined 05/02/04
Last Visit 07/05/19
3793 Posts
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 22:56:53 GMT
I wish people wouldn't ask double-barrelled questions Evil

Yes to the latter part of the sentence.
adam
United Kingdom
Joined 18/09/04
Last Visit 25/07/15
30 Posts
Posted on 17 March 2011 at 08:12:33 GMT
Only a quick opportunity to skim through and saw double-barrelled and artillery.

Oh, well....
pete
Wales
Joined 05/02/04
Last Visit 07/05/19
3793 Posts
Posted on 17 March 2011 at 08:26:07 GMT
Now that would be useful Gimme
Page 1