Author |
Page 1 |
ge2002bill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60eb3/60eb302df2aeea2f9f6b966fd4748cfd9ad47f4d" alt="United States United States" Joined 11/01/10 Last Visit 16/08/21 51 Posts
|
Posted on 14 March 2011 at 19:13:08 GMT Hello Pete, Off-Table Artillery ---------- 3x 100mm gun stands are off-table. 2x Forward Artillery Observers are on the table; each with a command value of 6. --------------------------------------- One arty. observer fails his command throw for the three guns. He throws a 7 to 11. --- Afterwards in the same turn, can the other observer: (a) Throw for a 6? (b) Throw for a 6-1 =5? (c) Or? (d) Or not at all? ----- Respectfully, Bill |
stu_dew
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 26/03/08 Last Visit 08/05/12 170 Posts
|
Posted on 14 March 2011 at 19:34:49 GMT Option (a) as although there is a -1 modifier for each successive order to a unit or formation (command modifiers table on page five) a failed command roll "means the order was not issued" (paragraph 3, page 5) to the failed attempt from the first FAO will not adversely affect the second's. |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 14 March 2011 at 19:35:22 GMT (a) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45320/453201d314a0079453bbb75c75dedeeeabdd1811" alt="Smile Smile" |
ebarrett
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af919/af919352333a7004cce10431848f61888d849575" alt="Ireland Ireland" Joined 20/12/07 Last Visit 31/10/12 55 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 10:25:44 GMT Really? I though off board arty was like an on table command - once someone has tried and fluffed the roll no one else can try to command them that round. |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 11:21:24 GMT Nope, read the section on artillery data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1fd/7a1fd9c819db72f0667767049cbee5c6e14bd600" alt="Wink Wink" |
ebarrett
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af919/af919352333a7004cce10431848f61888d849575" alt="Ireland Ireland" Joined 20/12/07 Last Visit 31/10/12 55 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 21:01:15 GMT Okay, well a follow up question. The American lists give the Yanks Close Artillery Support; if an American HQ units attempts to call in arty and fails the roll can that command unit then carry on attempting to command it's troops or is it done for the round? |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 21:17:29 GMT Yes. |
By-Tor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 16/11/10 Last Visit 11/04/21 63 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 21:23:43 GMT On another follow up if a Russian Scout unit with the artillery call in ability at Ld.6, if they fluff that can they attempt a communication instead? |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 22:03:58 GMT No |
stu_dew
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 26/03/08 Last Visit 08/05/12 170 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 22:25:28 GMT Q. "...if an American HQ units attempts to call in arty and fails the roll can that command unit then carry on attempting to command it's troops or is it done for the round?" A. "Yes." Double-barrelled, mutually exclusive proposition in that question, Pete. I'm thinking the "Yes" was for the "is it done for the round" part and not the "can that unit then carry on attempting to command its troops" bit. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/453a2/453a20848e40b03541352b8a972aef8e3a540b50" alt="Question Question" |
stu_dew
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 26/03/08 Last Visit 08/05/12 170 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 22:27:57 GMT (If not I've been getting things very wrong...) |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 15 March 2011 at 22:56:53 GMT I wish people wouldn't ask double-barrelled questions Yes to the latter part of the sentence. |
adam
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 18/09/04 Last Visit 25/07/15 30 Posts
|
Posted on 17 March 2011 at 08:12:33 GMT Only a quick opportunity to skim through and saw double-barrelled and artillery. Oh, well.... |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 17 March 2011 at 08:26:07 GMT Now that would be useful data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98a78/98a78719d2310f5f77ca8dcf4aebac4eb2b33948" alt="Gimme Gimme" |
Page 1 |