Author |
Page 1 |
dean62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 02/11/06 Last Visit 09/05/11 19 Posts
|
Posted on 30 December 2009 at 17:30:35 GMT Book arrived today v nice. I was planning a French Battlegroup and looked at the lists. Just one thing....have I got this right: Tanks must be mixed with infantry formations at no more than 3 per formation. Any order to a combined command, tanks and infantry, is -1. As tanks have to be with infantry then any order to that formation will be -1 when the basic command for a HQ is 7 which will take it down to 6 for its 1st throw. Unless I only give an order to the armour or infantry alone within the formation then the -1 does not apply? I just want to make sure Im reading that right. |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 30 December 2009 at 18:06:50 GMT Correct, but don't forget you have can have HQs with a higher CV than that. |
madaxeman
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 31/08/04 Last Visit 08/10/24 87 Posts
|
Posted on 04 January 2010 at 17:53:27 GMT As it says that the French tanks "must" be attached to an infantry formation, are you sure its possible to choose to move just the tanks or the infantry separately? |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 04 January 2010 at 17:54:32 GMT You can issue orders to any number of units within a formation, yes. |
nikharwood
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91acc/91acc9dda92684df4dc22f67b7f5f2edcaca0043" alt="Sea Sea" Joined 14/08/05 Last Visit 03/12/24 1472 Posts
|
Posted on 04 January 2010 at 18:04:59 GMT You sure can - the formation is made up of the different units, but there's nothing to say that they *all* have to do the same thing at the same time... So if I want them to do different things that's fine [eg tanks fire while infantry move] or even for units to do nothing while others within the formation do something else that's fine too [eg tanks fire, ATG fires, infantry hold] etc etc. Of course with rigid tactical doctrine you're getting a bonus if you choose to command everything to do the same - but even then you don't *have* to... |
nikharwood
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91acc/91acc9dda92684df4dc22f67b7f5f2edcaca0043" alt="Sea Sea" Joined 14/08/05 Last Visit 03/12/24 1472 Posts
|
Posted on 04 January 2010 at 18:05:43 GMT Cor - look, it clearly took me a load of time to type my four lines & Pete answered it in 13 words data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1fd/7a1fd9c819db72f0667767049cbee5c6e14bd600" alt="Wink Wink" |
Davout
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 05/05/05 Last Visit 19/04/16 11 Posts
|
Posted on 05 January 2010 at 14:45:23 GMT You don't have to follow this rule dean. The period I mainly play is Fr 1940 and have used a combo of tanks in penny-packets and/or more usual all tank/infantry formation for ages, depended upon the engagement. I'd simply use it as a guide. The French didn't penny-packet there tanks in ALL situations and it depends on what formations you are representing. |
polar bear
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 24/07/09 Last Visit 21/02/10 81 Posts
|
Posted on 05 January 2010 at 19:21:50 GMT I'm not sure that the "penny packets" rule accurately reflects the way several of the key French units operated - for example the DCRs and DLMs (the nearest they came to having Panzer Divisions). It seems a bit like modelling the entire German list on Infantry Divisions. The "poor combined-arms" rules however does ring true - indeed if anything it is probably appropriate to several other armies (including much later ones - for example the British/Canadian first tank battles in Normandy) to which it hasn't been applied. All the best Pb |
big dave
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 10/05/07 Last Visit 17/11/16 937 Posts
|
Posted on 05 January 2010 at 21:20:09 GMT I will be commanding the French on saturday, I am concerned. |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 05 January 2010 at 22:41:08 GMT All some of you seem to do is moan The lists provide you with some rules that apply generally to a particular army - that doesn't mean there weren't exceptions, but just like the Jerries didn't deploy Tiger IIs in every battle, the French rarely got all their tanks massed together for action. When they tried that, the tanks were without any support and they failed to show up anyway! |
cleach
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d76ed/d76ed8f8b35e84c3d2276e458a1e7333a50c26c3" alt="Canada Canada" Joined 20/03/05 Last Visit 02/03/11 228 Posts
|
Posted on 06 January 2010 at 00:49:01 GMT Moaning comes with the territory when you play French.... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a796/4a796d8c759478bd14f98e9feef287b1d923a921" alt="Lifeless Lifeless" |
polar bear
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 24/07/09 Last Visit 21/02/10 81 Posts
|
Posted on 06 January 2010 at 01:20:51 GMT Well, if it's any consolation Pete we only moan because we care about the rules. So the more we care, the more we moan! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1fd/7a1fd9c819db72f0667767049cbee5c6e14bd600" alt="Wink Wink" Take it as a sign of affection? All the best Pb |
EHMayer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60eb3/60eb302df2aeea2f9f6b966fd4748cfd9ad47f4d" alt="United States United States" Joined 02/01/10 Last Visit 29/03/10 2 Posts
|
Posted on 06 January 2010 at 01:58:35 GMT oh now there is a real typo! He meant sign of affliction! |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 06 January 2010 at 09:55:50 GMT Big Hug data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d24/e4d24ea1452f70bf76620ba09a1840c590e3b2e1" alt="Grin Grin" |
madaxeman
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 31/08/04 Last Visit 08/10/24 87 Posts
|
Posted on 06 January 2010 at 11:46:58 GMT So what it kinda means is that if you want to simulate the usual French performance and tactics, you should try and deploy tanks and infantry mixed in together, and then try and either move them together (taking the -1 hit on command) or perhaps move them with separate orders (avoiding the command penalty but taking the risk that your command fails part way through leaving one lot hung out to dry). I can see that that would have taken up more room .. |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 06 January 2010 at 11:48:28 GMT Yes, that's about it data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45320/453201d314a0079453bbb75c75dedeeeabdd1811" alt="Smile Smile" |
big dave
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 10/05/07 Last Visit 17/11/16 937 Posts
|
Posted on 06 January 2010 at 12:25:45 GMT I wasn't moaning, I like a challange! |
polar bear
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 24/07/09 Last Visit 21/02/10 81 Posts
|
Posted on 06 January 2010 at 14:51:03 GMT "Big Hug data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45320/453201d314a0079453bbb75c75dedeeeabdd1811" alt="Smile Smile" " And a big hug right back at ya! All the best Pb |
DougMe
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/746b8/746b84c58b31409074aa4c491e12d5ce63e9ece2" alt="Australia Australia" Joined 22/06/09 Last Visit 07/06/17 41 Posts
|
Posted on 11 January 2010 at 12:16:27 GMT Ouch.. Having developed a DAK 1942 Battlegroup (approx Brigade sized), and a Commonwealth Desert Force - and having lots of PzIII, II and I left over, I immediately thought of The Ghost Division.. ok, that's another Battlegroup.. (then there seem to be some leftover PzIV F2, Tigers, and my job lot of eBay CinC Germans had a bunch of PzIV - so there's one for Italy due..) In the midst of the lead obsession, I thought about a nice small French 1940 Battlegroup.. and erk! Nobbled... and with all my lovely GHQ models arriving today, I feel a dose of Gallic ennui coming on at the prospect of trying to roll 6 and under on 2 dice to do anything... |
Page 1 |