Author |
Page 1 |
justo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60eb3/60eb302df2aeea2f9f6b966fd4748cfd9ad47f4d" alt="United States United States" Joined 17/03/05 Last Visit 12/06/16 5 Posts
|
Posted on 18 July 2009 at 11:40:24 GMT Can anyone give me the stats for this unit? I can't find anything like it the Russian Army list. Thanks, Justo 832-527-4849 |
pete
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca63d/ca63d4fbd28497cfa9461e8e263d6bc5c5f936d1" alt="Wales Wales" Joined 05/02/04 Last Visit 07/05/19 3793 Posts
|
Posted on 18 July 2009 at 12:32:06 GMT Infantry units have them in the book. |
justo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60eb3/60eb302df2aeea2f9f6b966fd4748cfd9ad47f4d" alt="United States United States" Joined 17/03/05 Last Visit 12/06/16 5 Posts
|
Posted on 18 July 2009 at 12:40:11 GMT what page? |
justo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60eb3/60eb302df2aeea2f9f6b966fd4748cfd9ad47f4d" alt="United States United States" Joined 17/03/05 Last Visit 12/06/16 5 Posts
|
Posted on 18 July 2009 at 16:01:39 GMT ...and where can I find the German Mark IV-H? |
Kiwidave
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 04/06/04 Last Visit 31/05/19 841 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 00:38:49 GMT Russian infantry have either 1/20, 2/20 or 4/20 AT attacks (see note 1 on each of the Russian lists), depending on the stage of the war. I've also come up with this as a ATR unit: ATR Platoon: Infantry; Move:10cm; Attacks 3/10*; Hits 4; Save -; Cost 20; Limit -/-; Dates -; Notes: 2/20 against armour & soft vehicles Not used it yet though, due to not playing many games lately! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68de5/68de526e3e8e414f64d7b0a76d3a41992cd9feec" alt="Sad Sad" |
Kiwidave
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 04/06/04 Last Visit 31/05/19 841 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 00:42:32 GMT Also, the Panzer IV H-J is in the lists as Pz-IV long. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45320/453201d314a0079453bbb75c75dedeeeabdd1811" alt="Smile Smile" |
ianrs54
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bd08/5bd08e95fbcfd0064fbae38514694d37fa38f844" alt="England England" Joined 08/11/08 Last Visit 19/01/23 1348 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 01:03:08 GMT Kiwidave, the ATR platoon also carries a mix of SMG and Rifle, so should not have the *, it has 9 ATR teams, each of 2 men, plus a 4 man HQ. Panzer IV - F2 and G have the 75mmL43 Panzer IV - H and J have the 75mmL48. This has about 5% better penetration, not enough to worry about, whilst the J lacks the turret traverse engine, again not accounted for in any rule set I know of, but you use the slow traverse rule. IanS data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45320/453201d314a0079453bbb75c75dedeeeabdd1811" alt="Smile Smile" |
Gun_Hit
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 12/03/06 Last Visit 25/07/15 116 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 02:56:57 GMT While we are on the subject any particular reason for the 4/20 stats for anti-tank in the late war army lists? Adrian |
StefanPKs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0aba/b0abae3a96efe8f24695b39eb1e0b90366b373e0" alt="United Kingdom United Kingdom" Joined 07/08/07 Last Visit 24/10/12 220 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 04:00:06 GMT Panzerfaust, Panzersreck, Bazooka and Piat. |
Jimi T
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91acc/91acc9dda92684df4dc22f67b7f5f2edcaca0043" alt="Sea Sea" Joined 05/10/07 Last Visit 12/06/14 16 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 04:20:22 GMT Penetration difference between L43 and L48 is 12-14% depending on range. |
Kiwidave
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edfc/7edfc0a11001f02f1da0b9dad67ecefef55bd942" alt="New Zealand New Zealand" Joined 04/06/04 Last Visit 31/05/19 841 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 06:02:16 GMT Ian, if you read the whole stat line they have 3/10* normal attacks, and 2/20 AT attacks, so the * stays, as this is the non-AT attacks. If you like you can change it around to 2/20 attacks, and add 3/10* as a note instead. "Panzer IV - F2 and G have the 75mmL43 Panzer IV - H and J have the 75mmL48. This has about 5% better penetration, not enough to worry about, whilst the J lacks the turret traverse engine, again not accounted for in any rule set I know of, but you use the slow traverse rule." Which will be why they are all grouped together as 'long' in the list. |
fraserdw
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d76ed/d76ed8f8b35e84c3d2276e458a1e7333a50c26c3" alt="Canada Canada" Joined 16/03/07 Last Visit 03/03/10 18 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 08:49:06 GMT I came up with the 3/10 attack ATR platoon and have used them. Recommend you do not go hunting Panthers with them! |
ianrs54
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bd08/5bd08e95fbcfd0064fbae38514694d37fa38f844" alt="England England" Joined 08/11/08 Last Visit 19/01/23 1348 Posts
|
Posted on 19 July 2009 at 10:07:45 GMT Sorry Dave, missed that one. dislike limitimg attacks to particular target types, and upgrades. As to tactical use, the ATR platoon seems normally to have been issued out, in sections to companies, and may be down to the platoons ( 1 per), but in specific situations could have been kept together - Kursk would be one. Fraser - I use airpower, M10's and artillery against Panthers. Mark - you overestimate again - thats why figures should be at 30 degrees, you also need to know armour type, in this case homogeneous for Sherman, T34 and KV. Overall the Sherman is roughly the same as a T34/76, and the standard German round is APHE. Niether Sherman nor T34 seem to havehad problems with any Panzer IV, mind you it is only 50mm as opposed to 76mm (accounting for slope etc) on both Sherman and T34. IanS |
justo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60eb3/60eb302df2aeea2f9f6b966fd4748cfd9ad47f4d" alt="United States United States" Joined 17/03/05 Last Visit 12/06/16 5 Posts
|
Posted on 20 July 2009 at 19:09:08 GMT Wow! Thanks guys, that's lots of good info. |
Page 1 |