Posted on 02 May 2019 at 07:14:03 GMT The point is it is ambiguous, when it first states you need a 1, then on the next line states ones are failures. In reading more I'm now using upto 20cm on a 2 plus then incrementing it up by one per 10cm over that. But at 10cm you should be able to see things in plain sight, granted that coms aren't the best of things. But the rule needs to be clear, in that 1 can't be both a score to succeed and always a fail. A note you also need to add the same errata to CWC and FWC, as they both have the same oversight. |