The Commander Series Forum

Forum Home Forum Home
ImageCurrent Forum Category Cold War Commander, 1946+
ImageImageCurrent Forum CWC Rule Queries
ImageImageImageCurrent Topic Circumventing obstacles via flank deployment
Post Reply
Post Reply
Author Page 1 
stu_dew
United Kingdom
Joined 26/03/08
Last Visit 01/12/11
170 Posts
Posted on 13 July 2009 at 09:18:27 GMT
Situation:

In a ‘Deliberate Attack’ game a canal (deep wet terrain, page 19) runs the full length of the table’s centreline dividing the two armies. There are crossing places, but the attacker fears (not unreasonably) these may be heavily defended and / or mined. Using the flank deployment rule (which only forbids deployment in the final third of the table in attack / defence games, page 48) he could put the flanking force’s HQ in the middle of the central section of the chosen table edge (i.e. in the river). Once the command unit makes his roll, the troops constituting the flanking force can enter the table “at any point within the chosen section”, i.e. the far side of the canal. The attacker now has troops the other side of a major obstacle that stretches across the entire battlefield.

Legitimate?
steveww57
United Kingdom
Joined 04/08/07
Last Visit 20/09/15
231 Posts
Posted on 13 July 2009 at 10:52:32 GMT
I believe that in an earlier post Pete has indicated that in attack/defence games the attacker may not deploy in the defenders areas (centre section and home edge).
Kiwidave
New Zealand
Joined 04/06/04
Last Visit 31/05/19
841 Posts
Posted on 13 July 2009 at 10:54:39 GMT
You might need to apply something that is scenario specific, unless your oppo doesn't mind having enemy troops on his side of the canal!

You could also randomise it: 5+ on the far side, 1-4 on your side. Or something similar...
pete
Wales
Joined 05/02/04
Last Visit 07/05/19
3793 Posts
Posted on 13 July 2009 at 11:07:01 GMT
No they can't if crossing the water obstacle is the objective, ie: a river crossing.
stu_dew
United Kingdom
Joined 26/03/08
Last Visit 08/05/12
170 Posts
Posted on 13 July 2009 at 11:12:32 GMT
And if the objective is something else (a hill, a river, a crossroads or whatever) deeper in the defender's half of the table but the defender is (quite sensibly) utilising the line of the canal as part of his defence?
pete
Wales
Joined 05/02/04
Last Visit 07/05/19
3793 Posts
Posted on 13 July 2009 at 11:44:49 GMT
Up to you.
Page 1