The Commander Series Forum

Forum Home Forum Home
ImageCurrent Forum Category Cold War Commander, 1946+
ImageImageCurrent Forum CWC Rule Queries
ImageImageImageCurrent Topic Suppression Question
Post Reply
Post Reply
Author Page 1 
Batesmt
United States
Joined 23/08/07
Last Visit 26/09/17
5 Posts
Posted on 14 September 2017 at 19:19:25 GMT
I need clarification on "suppression fire" on page 21 of the CWC rule book. Do units that have a save value roll-off the hits caused by units that can only suppress the unit. For example, if an attacker has a 4/40* attack value and rolls 2 "6"s, does the target use its save value to prevent the suppression? Or are the two "6"s in this case re-rolled with another six result indicating the target unit is suppressed?

Thanks in advance, also apologies if this was answered years ago.

Mitch
Dr Dave
Wales
Joined 08/10/07
Last Visit 04/11/19
936 Posts
Posted on 17 September 2017 at 20:37:07 GMT
From memory it's a single roll, not a double roll.
collins355
United Kingdom
Joined 16/08/09
Last Visit 27/08/21
170 Posts
Posted on 19 September 2017 at 20:00:52 GMT
You roll one die for each unsaved hit. So the target rolls its saves first. Then you move onto suppression if the target fails to save any of the hits scored.

The firer is trying to roll whatever the to-hit score was again to cause a suppression.
Batesmt
United States
Joined 23/08/07
Last Visit 14/10/17
5 Posts
Posted on 20 September 2017 at 04:01:46 GMT
Maybe I have not been clear. Please read the paragraph titled "suppressive fire" on page 21 and let me know what it is saying. In my example above, the 4/40* is an attacker that can only use suppressive fire against an armored target (one that has a save value). It is not clear to me.

Thanks again,
Mitch
cardophillipo
Sea
Joined 29/01/09
Last Visit 20/01/22
997 Posts
Posted on 20 September 2017 at 13:30:47 GMT
I think the answer is no if you have rolled two 'hits' for want of a better term and both have caused suppression then as far as I am aware the target is suppressed and does not save against the suppression.

Cheers

Richard P Grin
Batesmt
United States
Joined 23/08/07
Last Visit 14/10/17
5 Posts
Posted on 21 September 2017 at 01:09:07 GMT
Thanks to all for your input. Clearly this rule is not being applied in a standard fashion. Hopefully it gets more clearly written in the upcoming CWC new release in 2018.

Thank you,
Mitch
Dr Dave
Wales
Joined 08/10/07
Last Visit 04/11/19
936 Posts
Posted on 22 September 2017 at 09:30:43 GMT
This has got me puzzled, it's the same wording in bkcI. Having reread it again and again, there's no mention of saving rolls at all, and assuming that simplicity was Petes intention it does look as though it's meant to be:
1. Roll for suppressive hits - normal no of dice but only hit on 6's - there are no saves.
2. For each "hit" (i.e. 6) then roll for supression like normal.

So in your example there are no saves, and simply then roll for supression. We tend to use the morale types however for that, hence elite supression on a 6, along with some awful types suppressed on a 3+

Perhaps bizarrely this is better explained in BKCIII (!)
In there it points out that there are no saves, but only gives the example of infantry firing at AFVs and so gives a max range of 20cm. It also says that a target is only supressed once, further suppressions have no additional effect. It does not mention guns with no AP attacks firing at soft targets where the 20cm rule is a bit odd!
Batesmt
United States
Joined 23/08/07
Last Visit 14/10/17
5 Posts
Posted on 26 September 2017 at 20:58:01 GMT
Dr Dave - Thank you. I was leaning in that direction. That is how I will play it. Funny you mention BKC III: I only have I and II...lol.

Again, thank you, and thanks to the others that provided input.

Mitch
Page 1