The Commander Series Forum

Forum Home Forum Home
ImageCurrent Forum Category Cold War Commander, 1946+
ImageImageCurrent Forum CWC Rule Queries
ImageImageImageCurrent Topic IFVs carrying other than Infantry?
Post Reply
Post Reply
Author Page 1 
stu_dew
United Kingdom
Joined 26/03/08
Last Visit 01/12/11
170 Posts
Posted on 30 November 2009 at 10:58:58 GMT
The table on page 52 shows IFVs as only being able to carry infantry. However, note 26 on page 120 describes how SA-7 and SA-14 (both classed as ‘Artillery’) are able to fire without the need to dismount when carried by a BMP (an IFV). Obviously the note to the army list takes precedence here, but my question is are there / should there be any other exceptions to the ‘infantry only’ rule for IFVs?
opsctr
United States
Joined 30/09/09
Last Visit 05/03/10
14 Posts
Posted on 02 December 2009 at 06:56:21 GMT
My note 26 on page 120 says:

Note 26. Air Defense Unit - SAM, SA-7/SA-14
May fire without dismounting when transported in BTR/BMD/BMP

Is it possible you have misread your rules, ...or is your addition misprinted? Our group's copies all say what is quoted above.

Will
gwydion
United Kingdom
Joined 15/02/08
Last Visit 21/06/22
305 Posts
Posted on 02 December 2009 at 07:17:58 GMT
Opsctr - I think that is exactly what Stu dew was saying -BUT his query is not whether p.120 says they can fire without dismounting, rather it is whether IFV can carry SA7 and 14s at all - p.52 seems to say 'no' only inf units, p.120 looks as if it says 'yes' they can.
I think the answer is that the BMP etc that can fire the SAM without dismounting (on p.120) are the ones in the air defence platoons in the motor rifle battalions - and are not carrying infantry groups and acting as IFV (on p.52)in this role - but I could be wrongSmile
skinnedpuppy
United Kingdom
Joined 04/11/08
Last Visit 02/09/13
135 Posts
Posted on 02 December 2009 at 07:48:34 GMT
Both SA7 & SA14 are manpads so it would be infantry that would be firing them, therefore nothing other than infantry would be being transported by the IFV.
gwydion
United Kingdom
Joined 15/02/08
Last Visit 21/06/22
305 Posts
Posted on 02 December 2009 at 09:03:01 GMT
Yeah, the problem revolved around the description of SA7 &SA14 as 'artillery' in the list on p.118 vice 'infantry'.
Agreed they are man portable- I think this is a nomenclature issue - are there other man-portable items that could be carried in a vehicle that currently are excluded from IFV because of the p.52 rule
When is an IFV not an IFV is something I think I'll let other people decide - Pete for preference.Grin
stu_dew
United Kingdom
Joined 26/03/08
Last Visit 08/05/12
170 Posts
Posted on 02 December 2009 at 09:46:44 GMT
That's what I was getting at gwyidion.

Whilst skinnedpuppy is obviously correct that the two AD systems I mentioned are MANPADS, the term ‘Infantry’ has a specific meaning within the game mechanics i.e. infantry is what the table on p. 52 and the ‘Arm’ column of an army list say it is. Indeed, the table recognises this when it specifically prevents infantry support units from being carried by IFVs, although they are themselves classed as ‘Infantry’. I have no quibble with this.

What I was asking was; are there any other exceptions (I can’t find any) and could a reasonable case be made to allow other units, currently prohibited, to be carried in an IFV. One for the TO&E wizards… Wink
ianrs54
England
Joined 08/11/08
Last Visit 19/01/23
1348 Posts
Posted on 03 December 2009 at 02:34:47 GMT
I sugest you work with - If it's in an Infantry company it goes in IFV.

IanS
gwydion
United Kingdom
Joined 15/02/08
Last Visit 21/06/22
305 Posts
Posted on 03 December 2009 at 02:56:44 GMT
Well if you're going to go round using common sense...Silly
Guy
ianrs54
England
Joined 08/11/08
Last Visit 19/01/23
1348 Posts
Posted on 04 December 2009 at 02:53:31 GMT
Its written into some rules don yer now !

ianS
Page 1